portuguese arbitration – Page 9 – ARBITRATION PORTUGAL

September 29, 2018April 11, 2026

Supreme Court of Justice (Portugal)| State Courts are not Competent to Decide the Validity of the Arbitration Agreement |28-05-2015 | Case #069

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 28-05-2015
Case Nr. 2040/13.0TVLSB.L1.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
State courts are not competent to decide the invalidity of the arbitration agreement, unless such invalidity is blatant.

Summary:
1. Since the defendant invoked an arbitration agreement in … Read more

September 28, 2018April 11, 2026

Lisbon Court of Appeal | Arbitration in Standard Form Contracts | 24-02-2015 | Case #068

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 24-02-2015
Case Nr. 2186.13.5TVLSB.L1-7
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
An arbitration agreement included in a standard form contract (such as a swap agreement) produces a negative effect upon the jurisdiction of the state court to hear a

September 27, 2018April 11, 2026

Lisbon Court of Appeal | Arbitrators’ Fees | 01-07-2014 | Case #064

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 01-07-2014
Case Nr. 200/14.6YRLSB-7
LINK DGSI

Headline:

Complexity of the case, time consumed, (and other) factors must be considered when fixing the arbitrator’s fees.

Summary:

When fixing the arbitrators’ fees, it

September 26, 2018April 11, 2026

Lisbon Court of Appeal | Compulsory Penalty | Motivation of the arbitral award | 13-02-2014 |Case #040

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 13-02-2014
Case Nr. 724/13.2YRLSB-8
LINK DGSI

Headline:

In the absence of an express provision providing jurisdiction, arbitral tribunals cannot impose periodic penalty payments.

Arbitral awards that do not explain relevant facts should be … Read more

September 25, 2018April 11, 2026

Lisbon Court of Appeal | Mandatory Arbitration | Validity of the Patent in Dispute as Objection | 21-06-2018 | Case #067

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 21-06-2018
Case Nr. 2384/17.2YRLSB.L1-8
LINK DGSI

Headline:

In a mandatory arbitration initiated according to Law Nr. 62/2011, of 12 December 2011, the defendant is admitted to contest the claim by raising an objection grounded

September 24, 2018April 11, 2026

Lisbon Court of Appeal | Arbitrators’ Fees | 10-09-2013 | Case #038

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 10-09-2013
Case Nr. 297/13.6YRLSB-7
LINK DGSI

Headline: Arbitrators may consider circumstances such as the complexity of the issues decided, the value of the case and the time spent on arbitral proceedings to determine

September 23, 2018April 11, 2026

Supreme Court of Justice (Portugal) | Hierarchical Competent Court to Recognise Foreign Arbitral Awards | 25-02-2014 | Case #037

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 25-02-2014
Case Nr. 29/13.9YRPRT.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:

**In proceedings commenced before the new arbitration law entered into force, all foreign awards and all decisions by foreign courts were to be reviewed and confirmed by**

September 22, 2018April 11, 2026

Lisbon Court of Appeal | Arbitrators’ Fees | 06-02-2014 |Case #039

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 06-02-2014
Case Nr. 866/13.4YRLSB-2
LINK DGSI

Headline:

Parties may challenge the amount of fees and expenses fixed by arbitrators in the state court. However, this right is lost if the parties have shown

September 21, 2018April 11, 2026

Supreme Court of Justice (Portugal) | Application of the new Arbitration Act ratione temporis | Appeal and Setting Aside | 13-07-2017 | Case #044

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 13-07-2017
Case Nr. 2455/13.4YYLSB-A.L1.S1
LINK DGSI

Headline:

Arbitrations commenced before the 2011 LAV entered into force, regardless of when the arbitral award is rendered.

Examination of the merits of the arbitral award is possible

September 20, 2018April 11, 2026

Supreme Court of Justice (Portugal) | Application of the Code of Civil Procedure to Arbitral Proceedings | Due Process | 10-12-2015 | Case #042

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 10-12-2015
Case Nr. 3486/12.7TBLRA.C1.S1
LINK DGSI

Headline:

Arbitrators may dispense with the requirement of taking personal testimony from both parties.

Summary:

The arbitrator, as a well-informed and impartial judge, has to decide

Supreme Court of Justice Date: 28-05-2015 Case Nr. 2040/13.0TVLSB.L1.S1 LINK DGSI

Headlines: State courts are not competent to decide the invalidity of the arbitration agreement, unless such invalidity is blatant.

Lisbon Court of Appeal Date: 24-02-2015 Case Nr. 2186.13.5TVLSB.L1-7 LINK DGSI

Headlines: An arbitration agreement included in a standard form contract (such as a swap agreement) produces a negative effect upon the jurisdiction of the state court to hear a

Lisbon Court of Appeal Date: 01-07-2014 Case Nr. 200/14.6YRLSB-7 LINK DGSI

Headline:

Summary:

Lisbon Court of Appeal Date: 13-02-2014 Case Nr. 724/13.2YRLSB-8 LINK DGSI

Headline:

In the absence of an express provision providing jurisdiction, arbitral tribunals cannot impose periodic penalty payments.

Lisbon Court of Appeal Date: 21-06-2018 Case Nr. 2384/17.2YRLSB.L1-8 LINK DGSI

Headline:

In a mandatory arbitration initiated according to Law Nr. 62/2011, of 12 December 2011, the defendant is admitted to contest the claim by raising an objection grounded

Lisbon Court of Appeal Date: 10-09-2013 Case Nr. 297/13.6YRLSB-7 LINK DGSI

Headline: Arbitrators may consider circumstances such as the complexity of the issues decided, the value of the case and the time spent on arbitral proceedings to determine

Supreme Court of Justice Date: 25-02-2014 Case Nr. 29/13.9YRPRT.S1 LINK DGSI

Headlines:

In proceedings commenced before the new arbitration law entered into force, all foreign awards and all decisions by foreign courts were to be reviewed and confirmed by

Lisbon Court of Appeal Date: 06-02-2014 Case Nr. 866/13.4YRLSB-2 LINK DGSI

Headline:

Parties may challenge the amount of fees and expenses fixed by arbitrators in the state court. However, this right is lost if the parties have shown

Supreme Court of Justice Date: 13-07-2017 Case Nr. 2455/13.4YYLSB-A.L1.S1 LINK DGSI

Headline:

Arbitrations commenced before the 2011 LAV entered into force, regardless of when the arbitral award is rendered.

Examination of the merits of the arbitral award is possible

Supreme Court of Justice Date: 10-12-2015 Case Nr. 3486/12.7TBLRA.C1.S1 LINK DGSI

Headline:

Arbitrators may dispense with the requirement of taking personal testimony from both parties.

Summary:

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 28-05-2015
Case Nr. 2040/13.0TVLSB.L1.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
State courts are not competent to decide the invalidity of the arbitration agreement, unless such invalidity is blatant.

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 24-02-2015
Case Nr. 2186.13.5TVLSB.L1-7
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
An arbitration agreement included in a standard form contract (such as a swap agreement) produces a negative effect upon the jurisdiction of the state court to hear a

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 01-07-2014
Case Nr. 200/14.6YRLSB-7
LINK DGSI

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 13-02-2014
Case Nr. 724/13.2YRLSB-8
LINK DGSI

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 21-06-2018
Case Nr. 2384/17.2YRLSB.L1-8
LINK DGSI

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 10-09-2013
Case Nr. 297/13.6YRLSB-7
LINK DGSI

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 25-02-2014
Case Nr. 29/13.9YRPRT.S1
LINK DGSI

**In proceedings commenced before the new arbitration law entered into force, all foreign awards and all decisions by foreign courts were to be reviewed and confirmed by**

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 06-02-2014
Case Nr. 866/13.4YRLSB-2
LINK DGSI

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 13-07-2017
Case Nr. 2455/13.4YYLSB-A.L1.S1
LINK DGSI

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 10-12-2015
Case Nr. 3486/12.7TBLRA.C1.S1
LINK DGSI