Portuguese Arbitration – Page 11 – ARBITRATION PORTUGAL

August 5, 2018April 11, 2026

Porto Court of Appeal | Kompetenz-Kompetenz | Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements by Non-Signatories | Abuse of Rights | 08-03-2016 | Case #009

Porto Court of Appeal
Date: 08-03-2016
Case Nr. 2164/14.7TBSTS.P1

Headline:

State courts must confine themselves to questions of non-existence, nullity or inoperability of the arbitration clause. Non-signatories may be joint to arbitration, and can even claim to be … Read more

August 4, 2018April 11, 2026

Porto Court of Appeal | Jurisdiction of Sports Arbitration Court | 27-06-2018 | Case #008

Porto Court of Appeal
Date: 27-06-2018
Case Nr. 64161/17.9YIPRT.P1
LINK DGSI

This case summary was kindly prepared by Rishabh Raheja, (rishabharaheja@gmail.com, NALSAR University of Law), Sameer Thakur (sameerthakur@live.in, NALSAR University of Law), and Abhishek Babbar (abhishekbabbar1996@gmail)

Headlines:

The Sports

August 3, 2018April 11, 2026

Lisbon Court of Appeal | Kompetenz-Kompetenz | Financial Distress of one of the Parties does not render the Arbitration Clause Inoperative | 22-09-2015 | Case #007

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 22-09-2015
Case Nr. 1212/14.5T8LSB.L1-7
LINK DGSI

Related CASE: Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice of 26-04-2016 HERE

Headlines:
The arbitral tribunal is competent to decide the validity of the arbitration agreement, unless such invalidity

August 2, 2018April 11, 2026

Supreme Court of Justice (Portugal) | Replacement of Arbitrator and Impact on the Proceedings | 15-02-2017 | Case #006

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 15-02-2017
Case Nr. 831/15.7YRLSB.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
When an arbitrator is replaced, the arbitral tribunal shall take the procedural steps that it deems necessary, and it can decide for the repetition of acts and later

July 31, 2018April 11, 2026

Supreme Court of Justice (Portugal) | Annulment and Motivation of the Arbitral Award | 16-03-2017 | Case #004

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 16-03-2017
Case Nr. 1052/14.1TBBCL.P1.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
– An arbitral award may only be challenged in an annulment procedure and it is not subject to appeal unless the parties have provided otherwise.
– The grounds

July 30, 2018April 11, 2026

Supreme Court of Justice (Portugal) | Ex Aequo et Bono | Motivation of the Arbitral Award | 22-09-2016 | Case #003

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 22-09-2016
Case Nr. 660/15.8YRLSB.L1.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
The arbitrators shall not be deemed as deciding a case according to “ex aequo et bono” if they are merely applying a substantive legal rule that calls for

Porto Court of Appeal Date: 27-06-2018 Case Nr. 64161/17.9YIPRT.P1 LINK DGSI

Headlines:

The Sports

Lisbon Court of Appeal Date: 22-09-2015 Case Nr. 1212/14.5T8LSB.L1-7 LINK DGSI

Headlines: The arbitral tribunal is competent to decide the validity of the arbitration agreement, unless such invalidity

Supreme Court of Justice Date: 15-02-2017 Case Nr. 831/15.7YRLSB.S1 LINK DGSI

Headlines: When an arbitrator is replaced, the arbitral tribunal shall take the procedural steps that it deems necessary, and it can decide for the repetition of acts and later

Supreme Court of Justice Date: 16-03-2017 Case Nr. 1052/14.1TBBCL.P1.S1 LINK DGSI

Headlines: – An arbitral award may only be challenged in an annulment procedure and it is not subject to appeal unless the parties have provided otherwise. – The grounds

Supreme Court of Justice Date: 22-09-2016 Case Nr. 660/15.8YRLSB.L1.S1 LINK DGSI

Headlines: The arbitrators shall not be deemed as deciding a case according to “ex aequo et bono” if they are merely applying a substantive legal rule that calls for

Porto Court of Appeal
Date: 27-06-2018
Case Nr. 64161/17.9YIPRT.P1
LINK DGSI

Lisbon Court of Appeal
Date: 22-09-2015
Case Nr. 1212/14.5T8LSB.L1-7
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
The arbitral tribunal is competent to decide the validity of the arbitration agreement, unless such invalidity

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 15-02-2017
Case Nr. 831/15.7YRLSB.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
When an arbitrator is replaced, the arbitral tribunal shall take the procedural steps that it deems necessary, and it can decide for the repetition of acts and later

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 16-03-2017
Case Nr. 1052/14.1TBBCL.P1.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
– An arbitral award may only be challenged in an annulment procedure and it is not subject to appeal unless the parties have provided otherwise.
– The grounds

Supreme Court of Justice
Date: 22-09-2016
Case Nr. 660/15.8YRLSB.L1.S1
LINK DGSI

Headlines:
The arbitrators shall not be deemed as deciding a case according to “ex aequo et bono” if they are merely applying a substantive legal rule that calls for